Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
MAYES v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: ROBERT MAYES
Defendant: FLOYD COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYES v. MITCHELL
as 3:2023cv00182
Plaintiff: KENNETH Q. MAYES
Defendant: DAN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. KOSATEK et al
as 2:2023cv00374
Plaintiff: JERMAINE C. BRADLEY
Defendant: KOSATEK, CHESTERFIELD and MAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2022cv00524
Plaintiff: JERMAINE C. BRADLEY
Defendant: WARDEN, HALL, PIGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01986
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURENTINE v. AMERICAN GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01753
Defendant: HENRY MAYE, AMERICAN GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and HENRY MAYE, II
Plaintiff: JERRY TURENTINE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00467
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00468
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAYES v. WARDEN
as 3:2018cv00031
Miscellaneou: BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: ANTHONY W. MAYES
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04334
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?