Cases 1 - 10 of 377
MITCHELL v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
as 1:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA MITCHELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HAMILTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL HAMILTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
MITCHELL HAMILTON
Respondent:
PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
TEAGUE v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. TEAGUE, SR.
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DIANE PHEIFFER, I. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REAMER v. MITCHELL
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
ADAM REAMER
Defendant:
BRADEN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHWOEPPE v. MITCHEL
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHWOEPPE, JR.
Defendant:
DAN MITCHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
LAKESHA MITCHELL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUGHES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HUGHES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
