Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv02978
Plaintiff:
JAYME SMITH
Defendant:
COLTIN CLARK, PATTY CLOUSE, LIND L. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTSLAR et al v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
DELBERT S. GADDIS, III, AARON MATTINGLY, CODY FIELDS and others
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTINGLY v. BRADY AND CLARK TRANSPORT, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00144
Plaintiff:
WHITNEY MATTINGLY
Defendant:
GARY E. SCHREINER, BRADY AND CLARK TRANSPORT, LLC, D/B/A B AND C and BRADY AND CLARK TRANSPORT, LLC doing business as B AND C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. FINK et al
as 3:2020cv00124
Defendant:
PETE MATTINGLY, BILLY BOLIN, KELLI FINK and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE G. LEWIS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GREEN et al v. JENSEN et al
as 1:2019cv02880
Defendant:
VALERIE KINCY, MARY THILMAN, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
A. H., Z. D. and CARMEN GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MATTINGLY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04708
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTINGLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HEAD-MATTINGLY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2017cv00572
Petitioner:
BRETT A. HEAD-MATTINGLY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
