Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SCHRAMM v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
PAUL E SCHRAMM and PAUL E. SCHRAMM
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KELLER v. BERTSCH et al
as 2:2020cv00029
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES and BRIAN BERTSCH
Plaintiff:
PAUL E. KELLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. BOWMAN et al
as 1:2018cv01307
Defendant:
ALEX CHRISTOPHER BOWMAN, ELIZABETH A. HARDTKE, TIM MCLAUGHLIN and others
Plaintiff:
KIEL STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLER v. PORTER et al
as 2:2018cv00056
Defendant:
DANIEL BERTSCH, MRS. PORTER and WEXFORD
Plaintiff:
PAUL E. KELLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RHODES v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv00452
Petitioner:
PAUL E. RHODES
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OKEREKE v. CONNORS et al
as 1:2012cv00194
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS A. CONNORS, JUDGE BONNIE H. MACLEOD and JUDGE PAUL E. TROY
Plaintiff:
PRECIOUS OKEREKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. VOHNE LICHE KENNELS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00054
Defendant:
AMERICAN WORKING DOGS UNITED, INC., CARROLL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CITY OF AURORA and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURTON v. LAYTON
as 1:2011cv01658
Plaintiff:
PAUL E. BURTON
Defendant:
JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FIKES v. WHITESELL et al
as 4:2011cv00034
Defendant:
HON. MITCH DANIELS, JOHN DOE 1-50, JEREMY FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO FIKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2010mc00069
Respondent:
TIMOTHY PAUL ALCORN, PAUL NEJAT ALP, DANIEL BAXTER WANN ALTMAN and others
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
