Cases 1 - 10 of 1,676
PRUDEN et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
MYRON S. PRUDEN, MARK C.O. COOK, SHANE C. HENDRICK and others
Defendant:
W. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. GASKIN et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD
Defendant:
RICHARD GASKIN and DEZARAY WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
BRITTANY A. TORRES, KYLEIGH J. INGALIS, LETICIA MARTINEZ-MATEOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACKALL v. BELL et al
as 2:2024cv00296
Defendant:
RICHARD STUART JOSEPH, KATHERINE SWEENLEY BELL, KATHRYN STUART and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MACKALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SMITH
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLANTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
RODIA BLANTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDS v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner:
RANDALL RICHARDS
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STACY v. TEMPLE et al
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD STACY
Defendant:
DYLAN TEMPLE, TEMPLE, SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
