Cases 1 - 10 of 1,311
ROEHRMAN et al v. Malwarebytes Inc.
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROEHRMAN and Annamarie Stapinski
Defendant:
Malwarebytes Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
AGUILAR et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
MONA E. AGUILAR and THOMAS AGUILAR
Defendant:
LESA TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
THOMAS v. USA
as 1:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
JOHN E. THOMAS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN, DANNY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. GOFFINET et al
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
LUCY GOFFINET and T. PARKER HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
BLUE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, FRANK VANIHEL, DENNIS REGGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, PAIGE WHITE and GINA WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
