Cases 1 - 10 of 13
STARKS v. U.S MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
BRANDI STARKS
Defendant:
U.S MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
BENNETT v. U.S. MARSHAL'S
as 1:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL'S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WRIGHT v. U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2020cv00626
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WRIGHT
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, T. J. WATSON and WILLIAM BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SWALLERS v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2016cv00656
Defendant:
F.B.I., U.S MARSHALS SERVICE and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff:
BRENT SWALLERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAN v. SKAGGS et al
as 1:2015cv02073
Defendant:
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EALY et al v. DLOTT et al
as 1:2015cv00669
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, BRAD BIERMAN, SUSAN DLOTT and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE Q. ELLIS EALY, LARRY E. EALY and SCLG-LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00481
Defendant:
JENNIFER COFFMAN, FBI OFFICE, SECRET SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
STACY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DILLARD v. U.S. MARSHAL, ANN CHAMBLERS et al
as 3:2012cv00005
Defendant:
CAPT. MCQUISTON, LT. HENDRIX, LT. MCALLISTER and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY DILLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2011cv01587
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER L. HARRIS
Respondent:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SYKES v. ELLIOT et al
as 2:2011cv00185
Defendant:
CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE OF BOP, MR. ELLIOT, WARDEN KASNER and others
Plaintiff:
MARRICCO A. SYKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
