Cases 21 - 30 of 1,404
Kennedy v. Crews et al
as 0:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Kennedy
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, David Green, Lt. Nathan Elam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goff v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kamron Goff
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Green
as 0:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Khalil Coleman
Defendant:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Airmark et al
as 0:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Airmark, Department of Corrections, Little Sandy Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett et al v. USA
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Wanda Ellen Bennett and Michael Keith Bennett
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sneed v. Commonwealth of KY Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv00025
Defendant:
Robert Edward Sneed and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Wellpath Corporation, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carlos Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath Corporation, LLC, Dr. Kevin Smith, Summer James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargas v. Ashland Federal Correctional Institution
as 0:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Javier Vargas
Defendant:
Ashland Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Detective Rawlings et al
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Maceo Woods
Defendant:
Detective Rawlings, Lawson, Gaby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Mosley
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dayton Rice, II, Peewee and Dayton Ray Rice, II
Defendant:
Jaime Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
