Cases 151 - 160 of 7,535
Houchin et al v. Williams et al
as 0:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Leroy Alvin Houchin, II and Tabitha Bearden
Defendant:
Kevin Williams, Ashland Police Department, Boyd County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Young v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
Tramell Deon Young
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Wright
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walker v. Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
as 2:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Darrin Walker
Respondent:
Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ball v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harold Ball
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyer v. KCDC Medical Staff
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Boyer
Defendant:
KCDC Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Crews
as 0:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Brett Simpson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Gier et al
as 2:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lucas
Defendant:
Officer Jacob Gier, Officer Unknown Poore and Judge Easterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Bell County Fiscal Court et al
as 6:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Justin Howard
Defendant:
Bell County Fiscal Court, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petrey v. Mazza, et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Petitioner:
William Royal Petrey
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza, Supreme Court of Kentucky, Kentucky Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
