Cases 201 - 210 of 30,943
McPeek v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
as 7:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Linda McPeek
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Harp v. Central Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Patricia Harp
Defendant:
Central Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Roland v. Booth et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Susan Roland
Defendant:
Savannah J Booth, Allison Brinkhaus and William Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jones v. FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
CRAIG QUINZEL JONES and KEITH DOUGHERTY
Respondent:
FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hopkins v. Schulte et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Larry Hopkins
Defendant:
Conrad Schulte and Keane Thummel Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael David Morris
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Couch et al v. Cox
as 0:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roy Couch
Defendant:
Frank Cox and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
