Cases 51 - 60 of 676
Compton v. SSA
as 7:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Keith E. Compton
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McFarland et al v. Scott
as 7:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Sharon B. McFarland and Joseph Craig Reynolds
Defendant:
Timothy E. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Henson v. C.A.R. Transport, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Courtney Henson
Defendant:
C.A.R. Transport, Inc. and Jonathan E. Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Troxell v. Morgan et al
as 6:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Destil Eugene Troxell
Defendant:
Philip R. Morgan and Larry E. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ealy v. Knoelble
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Ealy
Defendant:
William Knoelble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 2:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Anthony Geno Martinson
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Boone County Circuit Court, Boone County Public Advocate's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parton v. Parton et al
as 6:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
David E. Parton
Defendant:
Johnny Parton, Tim Parton and Henley Mining, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Davis v. Althauser et al
as 7:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
E. Althauser, R. Ward and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. Crews et al
as 0:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Donte Lamont Harris
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, James David Green, Terry Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allstate Insurance Company v. Weco LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00324
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company
Defendant:
Weco LLC and Stephen E. Weafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
