Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Aelstyn v. Sparks et al
as 5:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Michael Van Aelstyn
Defendant:
Coleman Sparks and Scott Carnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carnes v. SSA
as 6:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jamison Carnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carnes et al v. Hall et al
as 7:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Brittany Carnes, Keshia Brown, Valerie Hall and others
Cross Defendant:
Jordan Hall
Cross Claimant:
KellWell Food Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Pike County Fiscal Court doing business as Pike County Detention Center
Executor:
Brian Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. Carnes et al
as 7:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Bobby W. Carnes, Progressive Direct Insurance Company and Hills Trucking Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tara Smith and Matthew Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Cole et al
as 6:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant:
James William Cole, The BRC Group, LLC and Willard Carnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carnes v. Woodruff et al
as 2:2011cv00154
Plaintiff:
Michael Carnes
Defendant:
Sylvia Woodruff and Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carnes v. SSA
as 6:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Carnes
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lalley et al v. Bennett et al
as 2:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
MA
Defendant:
Alisha N. Bennett, Angie Thompson, Jacquelyn Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
