Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Carr v. Beltone Electronics Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Juanita Carr
Defendant:
Beltone Electronics Corporation, H. William Mattingly Corporation, GN Hearing Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bey v. Robert F. Stephens Circuit Court et al
as 5:2019cv00316
Defendant:
Lexington Police Department, Lou Ann Red Corn, Heather McGregger and others
Plaintiff:
Noble Jerome Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattingly v. R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00170
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brent Mattingly
Defendant:
R.J. Corman Railroad Construction, LLC and R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jointer v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2019cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jointer
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy, Timothy Moore, Lou Anna Red Corn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman Networks, Inc. v. Mattingly
as 5:2019cv00049
Defendant:
J. Basil Mattingly
Plaintiff:
Goodman Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
In re Attorney Admission for Carrie Marie Mattingly
as 5:2018aa00073
Defendant:
Attorney Admission for Carrie Marie Mattingly
In Re:
Attorney Admission Application
USA v. Mattingly
as 3:2017cv00005
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Charles B. Mattingly
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Wieck et al v. Bevin et al
as 3:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Randy Wieck , Betsy Bell , Jane Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bonds v. Rowlette et al
as 5:2016cv00124
Petitioner:
Todd Bonds
Respondent:
R.W. (Rick) Rowlette, Blackburn Correctional Complex, Ms. McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
