Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Townsend v. Harris
as 5:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Hunter Austin Lee Townsend
Defendant:
TJ Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vernon v. Frank et al
as 3:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Douglas Vernon
Defendant:
Hunter Frank and Lilly's Towing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ault v. Hershey et al
as 5:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
John William Ault
Defendant:
Hunter Hershey, Nicholas Ray Chandler, Lexington Fayette Urban County Government Community Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hunter v. Singh et al
as 5:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Joanne Hunter
Defendant:
Davinder Singh and Deol Trans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hunter v. Pike County, Kentucky et al
as 7:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
John C. Hunter
Defendant:
Pike County, Kentucky, Brian Morris, James Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laufenberg v. Root et al
as 6:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jamie Patrick Laufenberg
Defendant:
John Root, Hunter Disney and Laurel County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant et al v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00018
Executor:
Jazmine Bryant
Plaintiff:
BJB
Defendant:
Bill Hensley, Tim Rucker, Zachary Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. Lemaster
as 0:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Bobby Hunter
Respondent:
Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunter v. Lemaster
as 0:2021cv00088
Petitioner:
Bobby Hunter
Respondent:
Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00083
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Banks, Candice Banks, Jackie Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
