Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Frost v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2022cv01262
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Frost
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2021cv01532
Defendant:
Capt McDonald, Ofc Banks, Lt Plucket and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Jerod Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center et al
as 1:2018cv00716
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Frost
Defendant:
Natchitoches Parish Detention Center, Probation & Parole Natchitoches Parish, Dove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In RE: Deposition Subpoenas from Hay Exploration Inc to Non-Parties
as 2:2016mc00011
Movant:
G Janelle Frost , Laura Blackmon and Chris Lestage
Respondent:
Hay Exploration Inc
Merchants Bonding Co v. Roof Masters of N America L L C et al
as 3:2015cv02319
Plaintiff:
Merchants Bonding Co
Defendant:
Roof Masters of N America L L C, Ronald Gregory and Suzie Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poole v. Russell et al
as 3:2014cv00611
Plaintiff:
Hershel M Poole, Jr
Defendant:
Jay Russell, James Felts, Bradley Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merchants Bonding Co v. Roof Masters of N America L L C et al
as 3:2013cv02862
Plaintiff:
Merchants Bonding Co
Defendant:
Roof Masters of N America L L C, Ronald Gregory and Suzie Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frost v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv02838
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Frost
Defendant:
Natchitoches Parish Detention Center, Dean Dove, Calvin McFerrin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew v. Oakdale et al
as 2:2012cv02130
Plaintiff:
Willie W Andrew, Jr
Defendant:
Police Dept of Oakdale, 33rd Judicial District Court, Deroy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Young et al
as 2:2012cv01985
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Jaye Frost
Defendant:
J P Young , Arthur F Beeler , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
