Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Atkins #742687 v. Dawdy et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Allen Atkins #742687
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Unknown Party #1, J. Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel #537193 v. Hoffman-Prusi et al
as 2:2019cv00101
Defendant:
James Alexander, Unknown Durant, R. Horack and others
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v Grand Rapids Public School District et al
as 1:2015cv00258
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Tyson
Defendant:
Grand Rapids Public School District, Teresa Weatherall Neal, Bernard Colton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pittman et al v. Spectrum Health System
as 1:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tywana Pittman , TaTanisha Smith and Reshonda Atkins
Defendant:
Spectrum Health System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
VanPortfliet v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 1:2013cv01197
Plaintiff:
Paul Jay VanPortfliet
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage , Wells Fargo Bank , Howard I. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom #228931 v. Hines et al
as 2:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Anthoine Deshaw Odom #228931
Defendant:
Daniel Hines, Jeri Ann Sheri, Richard McKeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham #272603 v. Napel et al
as 2:2011cv00520
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
R. Napel, J. Larson, K. Tribley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanPortfliet v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 1:2011cv01185
Plaintiff:
Paul Jay VanPortfliet
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage , Howard I. Atkins , Kent, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Atkins #611584 v. Prelesnik
as 1:2010cv01093
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Jamarr Atkins #611584
Respondent:
John Prelesnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
