Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Peters #155318 v. Simpson et al
as 1:2015cv00751
Plaintiff:
Gary Peters #155318
Defendant:
Brenda Simpson, Daniel H. Heyns, Kenneth McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montes et al v. Prairieville, Township of et al
as 1:2015cv00695
Plaintiff:
John Montes , Renee Montes , Logan Montes and others
Defendant:
Prairieville, Township of , Barry, County of , Barry, Township of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crehan v. Maiden Lane LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00657
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Crehan
Defendant:
Maiden Lane LLC , Maiden Lane II LLC , Maiden Lane III LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McCrory #161192 v. Lepley et al
as 1:2013cv00536
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCrory #161192
Defendant:
Frederick J. Lepley, Mary Kelly and Cynthia Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane #143051 v. Michigan Parole Board
as 2:2013cv00090
Petitioner:
Raymond Lane #143051
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stiles v. AMF Lincoln Lanes
as 1:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Eugene Stiles
Defendant:
AMF Lincoln Lanes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stevens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00977
Plaintiff:
Lane Kenneth Stevens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lane v. Complete Music of Michigan, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00954
Plaintiff:
Anna Lane
Defendant:
Complete Music of Michigan, Inc. and Floyd O. Nobis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00388
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lane, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coach, Inc. et al v. Fashion Lane et al
as 2:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Fashion Lane, Jacqueline Martenson and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
