Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Jennings #711938 v. MacLaren et al
as 1:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mark Colin Jennings #711938, II
Defendant:
Duncan MacLaren, Kenneth McKee, Tom Mackie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crane #779001 v. Davenport et al
as 1:2017cv00360
Plaintiff:
Timothy Crane #779001
Defendant:
Barbara M. Davenport, A. Marshall, Brian Majerczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. University of Pittsburgh et al
as 1:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
University of Pittsburgh, James Shaw, Anil Gupta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tom King
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01449
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Rouse #274237 v. Matteucci et al
as 1:2016cv01358
Plaintiff:
Arthur Joseph Rouse #274237
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Michael Matteucci, Tom Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theriot #423068 v. Woods et al
as 2:2016cv00234
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dwayne Theriot #423068
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, Unknown Thompson, Unknown Libby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #221217 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00221
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams #221217
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Keefe Commissary Network Sales, Shane Place and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates #921700 v. Mackie
as 1:2016cv00985
Petitioner:
Daniel Bates #921700
Respondent:
Tom Mackie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Web Innovations & Technology Services, Inc. v. Bridges to Digital Excellence et al
as 1:2016cv00977
Plaintiff:
Web Innovations & Technology Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Bridges to Digital Excellence , Douglas Chapman , Gilbert J. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
