Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Gibbs v. Ottawa County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
John Gibbs
Defendant:
Ottawa County Board of Commissioners and Joe Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Huntington National Bank, The v. JV SBAM SA LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Huntington National Bank, The
Defendant:
JV SBAM SA LLC, John R. Gibbs, Diego Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bryant #463608 et al v. Horton et al
as 2:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
James Randle #224414, Kevin Weems #156780, Roger Ray #231180 and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Connie Horton and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Bitnar
as 2:2019cv00181
Petitioner:
Louis A. Gibbs
Respondent:
Mike Bitnar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gibbs A#038617218 v. Miller et al
as 1:2019cv00557
Plaintiff:
Louis Alister Gibbs A#038617218
Defendant:
Calhoun County Sheriff Department, Dave Tendziegloski and Matt Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs #137358 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00948
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Gibbs #137358
Defendant:
Adam Yukins, Michigan Department of Corrections and Unknown Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs #162140 v. Skytta et al
as 2:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
Stanley L. Gibbs #162140
Defendant:
Unknown Cordanaro, Unknown Holley, Unknown Bastiun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs #137358 v. Kolk
as 1:2018cv00717
Defendant:
Gerald Kolk
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Gibbs #137358
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00596
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony #660099 v. Salisbury et al
as 2:2017cv00184
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Anthony #660099
Defendant:
K. Salisbury, R. Nichols, Unknown Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
