Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Davis et al v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Sr., Charase Dorsey, Anisha Bird and others
Defendant:
Berrien, County of, Steve Pierangeli, Mark Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cullen v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Fathi Mushapha Cullen
Defendant:
Jane Jones, John Holmstrom, John Vanderlaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardrick #606507 v. Sanford et al
as 2:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Bernard Hardrick #606507
Defendant:
J. Sanford and Unknown Nurkala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ClarkWillis #726262 v. Napel et al
as 2:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Julius C. ClarkWillis #726262
Defendant:
Robert Napel, James Alexander, Erica Huss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lee Sanford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kaiser v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2017cv00343
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Kaiser
Defendant:
Lansing, City of and Scott Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Sanford #449818 v. Mullins et al
as 1:2016cv01431
Plaintiff:
Dominic Sanford #449818
Defendant:
Unknown Mullins, Joanne Buntind, Nicole Doolittle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor #232897 v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Charles Taylor #232897
Defendant:
Unknown Savior and Unknown Sanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford #173719 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2012cv00426
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Sanford #173719
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Michigan Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
