Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Underwood #289985 v. Binkley et al
as 1:2021cv00501
Defendant:
Unknown Binkley and Unknown Cope
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Underwood #289985
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaisdell #503481 et al v. Cassopolis, Village of et al
as 1:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Scott Reed Blaisdell #503481 and Vickie Lynn Blaisdell
Defendant:
Cassopolis, Village of, Cynthia M. LaGrow, Joseph M. Underwood, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. Underwood et al
as 1:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
Wilmar Nash
Defendant:
Joseph M. Underwood, Jr., Glenda Rogers, Paul Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood #827939 v. Gidley
as 1:2014cv00815
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Underwood #827939
Respondent:
Lori Gidley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dayson #213123 v. Cass County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2012cv01307
Plaintiff:
James Michael Dayson #213123
Defendant:
Cass County Board of Commissioners, Joseph Underwood and Canteen Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin #237710 v. Heidenreich et al
as 1:2012cv00778
Plaintiff:
James Martin #237710, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael P. Heidenreich, David A. Toxopeus and Joseph M. Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv00651
Plaintiff:
Thomas Underwood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights: Employment
Williams v. Cass County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2009cv00590
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Cass County Sheriff Department, Joseph M. Underwood, Richard Behnke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood #413128 v. Berghuis
as 1:2008cv00642
Petitioner:
Travis Michael Underwood #413128
Respondent:
Mary Berghuis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
