Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Lane v. Wilson et al
as 6:2020cv03236
Defendant:
Waylon Wilson, Michele Buckner and Donald Barton
Plaintiff:
Jeff Ramone Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane et al v. Holiday Inns, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00217
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Lane and Michelle Lane
Defendant:
Holiday Hospitality Franchising, LLC, Holiday Inns, Inc., The Bricton Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allmond et al v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
as 3:2019cv05058
Plaintiff:
Lane Allmond and Misty Allmond
Defendant:
Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv03262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Smith et al v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00377
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and AMF Pro Bowl Lanes
Plaintiff:
Phillip D Smith and Monica R Tanzey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craggs v. Fast Lane Car Wash & Lube, L.L.C.
as 6:2019cv03081
Defendant:
Fast Lane Car Wash & Lube, L.L.C. d/b/a In & Out Carwash and Fast Lane Car Wash & Lube, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Dale E. Craggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parrish v. Padilla
as 4:2019cv00090
Plaintiff:
Denver Lane Parrish
Defendant:
Carlos A. Padilla and Dean Word Company Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin Dale Davis v. Barry County, Missouri
as 3:2018cv05103
Plaintiff:
Martin Dale Davis
Defendant:
Barry County, Missouri, Naomi Daniel, Michael Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Permanent General Assurance Corporation v. Edwards et al
as 4:2018cv00468
Plaintiff:
Permanent General Assurance Corporation
Defendant:
Margaret Edwards and Brandon Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aquino v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
Catherine Aquino
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. , Andrea Kauffman , Karen Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
