Cases 11 - 20 of 164
Weber v. Wheatley et al
as 2:2023cv04092
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Weber
Defendant:
Tony Wheatley, Moniteau County, Missouri, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Knox v. Webber
as 6:2023cv03064
Petitioner:
Tony Ken Knox
Respondent:
Cybelle Webber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knox v. Webber
as 6:2023cv03023
Petitioner:
Tony Ken Knox
Respondent:
Cybelle Webber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burkhart v. Vinson et al
as 2:2022cv04161
Plaintiff:
Dustin Burkhart
Defendant:
Brian Vinson, Camden County, Missouri, Tony Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ost-Lasker v. White et al
as 4:2022cv06110
Plaintiff:
Lisa-Kathleen Ost-Lasker
Defendant:
Daniel White, Sandy Baldwin, Will Akin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Ost-Lasker v. White et al
as 5:2022cv06110
Plaintiff:
Lisa-Kathleen Ost-Lasker
Defendant:
Daniel White, Sandy Baldwin, Will Akin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Reynolds v. Cornerstone National Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv04140
Plaintiff:
Toni Reynolds
Defendant:
Cornerstone National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Harmon v. Helms et al
as 2:2022cv04129
Plaintiff:
Dennis Harmon
Defendant:
Tony Helms, Bryce Easley, Nevin Seaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Browder v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Toni Anderson Browder
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
