Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Carter v. Arnett et al
as 2:2015cv04052
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cardell Carter
Defendant:
Bevin Arnett, Curtis Whittle, Paul Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann v. City of Jefferson City, Missouri et al
as 2:2014cv04259
Plaintiff:
James Lee Spann aka Melvin Ford
Defendant:
City of Jefferson City, Missouri, Missouri Department of Corrections, George A. Lombardi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asbridge v. Norman et al
as 2:2013cv04283
Plaintiff:
Robbie Asbridge
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Jay Cassady, David Forester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skipper v. Cassady et al
as 2:2013cv04263
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Defendant:
Jay Cassady, Michelle Balman, Gracie Humphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphrey v. IRS
as 4:2012cv01185
Plaintiff:
John Jay Humphrey
Defendant:
IRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Humphrey v. Greene County Sheriff's Department
as 6:2012cv03231
Plaintiff:
Anthony Humphrey
Defendant:
Greene County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humphrey v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2011cv04120
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jay Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gandy, Jr. v. Humphrey et al
as 4:2010cv01285
Plaintiff:
Cecil B. Gandy, Jr.
Defendant:
Denise N. Humphrey, United Missouri Bank and Stough & Catt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson-Bagley v. Humphrey Farrington & McClain et al
as 4:2010cv01128
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Jackson-Bagley
Defendant:
Humphrey Farrington & McClain and James Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson-Bagley et al v. Albright et al
as 2:2009cv04215
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Jackson-Bagley and Darryl W. Bagley
Defendant:
George Barton Albright, Jr., Kenneth B McClain, Humphrey Farrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
