Cases 21 - 30 of 1,503
Bush v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
William Bush
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Josephine F. Meneses and Jeffrey D. Farson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Carmichael v. Williams
as 6:2024cv03013
Petitioner:
Kenja Carmichael
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Umpa v. National Association of Realtors et al
as 4:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Daniel Umpa
Defendant:
National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Prince v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03376
Plaintiff:
William Prince
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Snipes v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
William D Snipes
Defendant:
Wendlyn Jones, Denis McDonough, The Veteran's Crisis Line and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Silva v. USA
as 6:2023cv03372
Petitioner:
Stanley William Silva
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vazquez-Diaz v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv05104
Plaintiff:
Luis A Vazquez-Diaz
Defendant:
Unknown Williams and (John) Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v Huhn
as 2:2023cv04227
Plaintiff:
William Bill G Carter
Defendant:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Platte County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2023cv06160
Plaintiff:
Kevin Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Platte County Sheriff Department, Jared Pomeroy and Slater Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
