Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Woodworth v. Hulshof et al
as 5:2014cv06090
Defendant:
Kenneth Hulshof, Lyndel Robertson, Rochelle Koehly and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Woodworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv03289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Schnelle v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 5:2014cv06046
Plaintiff:
James R Schnelle
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Matthews, Debbie Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. Scroll Compressors, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv03109
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore and Paula Robertson
Defendant:
Scroll Compressors, LLC , Emerson Electric Co. , NALCO Chemical and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Navigato v. Treadwell et al
as 6:2013cv03309
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Navigato
Defendant:
James M. Treadwell, Brandon Robertson, Treadwell Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robertson v. Nationwide Insurance Company of America
as 4:2013cv00712
Plaintiff:
Steven Robertson
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
West v. Brankel et al
as 6:2013cv03237
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Renee West
Defendant:
Gary Don Brankel , Robert Allen Carter , Clarence Henry Liberty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Colvin
as 6:2013cv03076
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robertson v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv01419
Plaintiff:
Brenda F. Robertson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
