Cases 51 - 60 of 138
Fambrough et al v. Schroeder et al
as 4:2019cv00159
Plaintiff:
William L. Fambrough and Heather L. Fambrough
Defendant:
Gregory A. Martin, Janet McCarthy, Kent Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Fambrough et al v. Stephenson et al
as 4:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
William L. Fambrough and Heather L. Fambrough
Defendant:
NAD Ellen Healey and Area Specialist Janine A. Stephenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heather Dawn Haak v. Ruth A. Belcher, et al
as 6:2018cv03406
Defendant:
Clay T. Jeffries, Colton Clay Sawyer and Ruth A. Belcher
Plaintiff:
Heather Dawn Haak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proby v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2018cv04253
Defendant:
Deborah Willis, Narendrashinh Khengar, Paula Reed and others
Plaintiff:
George Proby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank National Association v. Epperson et al
as 5:2018cv06173
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Colby R. Epperson and Heather A. Epperson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company et al
as 4:2018cv00753
Defendant:
K.M. -T.E.H. Realty 4, LLC, Mt. Hawley Insurance Company and K.M.-T.E.H. Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kendra Roberts, Heather Roberts and Jacob Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gladden v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv04169
Plaintiff:
Heather Gladden
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Dawson et al
as 6:2018cv03233
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Heather Dawson and Bobby Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Eden v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv05056
Plaintiff:
Heather Eden
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
