Cases 51 - 60 of 683
Bell v. Precythe, et al
as 6:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Johnell A Bell
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Michele Buckner, Conrad Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Marshall Police Department
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Fred Hayes
Defendant:
Marshall Police Department, Nicolas Perez, Michael Bohannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Henry v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
David M Henry
Defendant:
Attorney General United States of America, U.S. Attorney Western District of Missouri, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Johnson v. Doe et al
as 6:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe
as 6:2023cv03028
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Doe et al v. Mosaic Health System et al
as 5:2023cv06008
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mosaic Health System doing business as Mosaic Life Care and Heartland Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Byrd v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv06005
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC,, Corizon, Inc., Corizon, Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeri Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Carter v. Doe et al
as 6:2022cv03319
Plaintiff:
Sam K Carter
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flaugher v. Rose et al
as 4:2022cv00800
Plaintiff:
Douglas W Flaugher
Defendant:
Kelly Rose, Kristen Ellis Hilbrenner and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pettis County et al
as 2:2022cv04165
Plaintiff:
Donna Smith
Defendant:
Pettis County, Brad Anders, Sam Hargrave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
