Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Shipley v. Callaway County, Missouri et al
as 2:2022cv04057
Defendant: Terry Shipley, Callaway County, Missouri, Clay Chism and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daily v. Akers et al
as 2:2020cv04154
Defendant: Robbie, Akers, Clay Chism and others
Plaintiff: Jerron Lamar Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Chism et al
as 2:2019cv04115
Defendant: Clay Chism, Steve Meyers and Robby Harris
Plaintiff: Tammy Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Chism
as 2:2016cv04338
Plaintiff: Jameson Trevor Smith
Defendant: Wade Chism
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala et al v. Mission Group Kansas, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00885
Plaintiff: Stephanie Ayala , Jennifer Decker , Christi Hampton and others
Defendant: Mission Group Kansas, Inc. , Board of Directors of Mission Group Kansas, Inc. , John Mucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chism v. Denney
as 4:2012cv00151
Petitioner: Charles E Chism
Respondent: Larry Denney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker et al v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00862
Plaintiff: Joel Baker , Kathy Baker , Margaret L. Barnett and others
Defendant: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. , Hunt Martin Materials, LLC , Material Transport Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chism v. Huff et al
as 5:2011cv06076
Plaintiff: Charles E Chism
Defendant: Shawn D Huff, Larry Denney and Mandy Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chism v. Barrett et al
as 4:2007cv00121
Plaintiff: Robert L. Chism
Defendant: M. S. Barrett, M. C. Hollis, Stone Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chism v. Vittetoe et al
as 4:2007cv00113
Plaintiff: Robert L. Chism
Defendant: Jack Vittetoe, Mark Price, Joyce Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?