Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mainka v. Sheriffs Office et al
as 6:2022cv03223
Plaintiff:
Frank Mainka
Defendant:
Sheriff Office, Unknown Sex Offender Registry Officer, Unknown Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Cristobal et al
as 5:2021cv06089
Plaintiff:
Ryan Randall
Defendant:
Ismael Cristobal, Lauren Houston, Richard McGregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morningside Church, Inc. et al v. Rutledge et al
as 3:2020cv05050
Defendant:
Kimberly R. H. Lewis, District Attorney for the County of Merced, California, Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General for the State of Arkansas, Mike Feuer, City Attorney for the City of Los Angeles, California and others
Plaintiff:
Pastor Jim Bakker, Morningside Church, Inc., Morningside Church Productions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson et al v. White America et al
as 4:2017cv00474
Plaintiff:
Keith Hudson, Orlando Gentry, Harrell Johnson and others
Defendant:
White America, White Government, White Prosecutors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Unknown Police Officer et al
as 3:2015cv05043
Plaintiff:
Gary P Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Unknown Police Officer, Theresa L Kenney and District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Bryant et al
as 6:2015cv03160
Plaintiff:
Ryan Antonio Lewis
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bryant, Philip Fuhrman, Jonathan David Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Porter et al
as 4:2011cv01141
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Harris
Defendant:
Marjore Porter, Nicole Mudd, David Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 4:2009cv00390
Petitioner:
Danny Parker-Bey
Respondent:
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF _________________ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF __________________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
