Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Calhoun v. Kansas City Credit Union et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff: Sarah Calhoun
Defendant: Kansas City Credit Union, Crystal Ammons, Stephanie Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Amador v. Pare, et al
as 4:2020cv00455
Defendant: Cecilia Abbott, John Wood, Doug McMillan and others
Plaintiff: Edward Amador
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00102
Plaintiff: Carryne Jean Earnest
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Brown v Colvin
as 3:2014cv05124
Plaintiff: Earnest Eugene Brown
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Earnest v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00615
Plaintiff: Carryne J. Earnest
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Langston v. Russell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00638
Petitioner: Earnest Lee Langston
Respondent: Terry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05086
Plaintiff: Earnest Eugene Brown
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Spencer v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv06020
Plaintiff: Randy G Spencer
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Jackson Institutional Dental Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langston v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv04032
Plaintiff: Earnest Lee Langston
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections and George Lombardi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Langston v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 2:2010cv04015
Plaintiff: Earnest Lee Langston
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?