Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Breal v. The Downs Law Group et al
as 3:2021cv00622
Plaintiff:
Rachel Gildea Breal
Defendant:
The Downs Law Group, Charles David Durkee, Hood & Bolen, P.L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Jacob Law Group
as 3:2021cv00571
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
Jacob Law Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Buras v. Morris Bart Law Firm LTD
as 1:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Ricky M. Buras, Sr.
Defendant:
Morris Bart Law Firm LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dearing v. Wilkinson County Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dearing
Defendant:
Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, Law Librarian Rosemary Gatlin, United States Postmaster and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of James Harris v. Eichelberger et al
as 3:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
The Estate of James Harris
Defendant:
The Eichelberger Law Firm PLLC and Jonathan M. Eichelberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bowman v. McDonnell Law Firm, P.A. et al
as 1:2021cv00121
Defendant:
Metlife Legal Plans, Inc., McDonnell Law Firm, P.A. and Hyatt Legal Plans, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Bowman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Duncan v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2020cv00117
Plaintiff:
Alex-Wayne Duncan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warren Law Office, Trustmark National Bank, Shapiro & Brown, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
