Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Sullivan v. Forrest County Adult Detention Center et al
as 2:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
Dre'Shawn Miegal Sullivan
Defendant:
Forrest County Adult Detention Center, Hattiesburg Police Department, Southern Health Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniel Sullivan
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ivy et al v. City of Magee, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Michael Ivy and Michele Ivy
Defendant:
City of Magee, Mississippi , Joey Womack , William Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonson v. Dukes et al
as 3:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
Sullivan Dukes, Jr., Amerihomes, LLC, Pierce Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonson v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
Matthew Gordon Sullivan, Grover Brothers Equipment, Inc., Hub Refrigeration & Fixture Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Lynch et al
as 5:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Justo Pastor Rodriguez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Dave Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramos v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
Eddy Alberto-Deleon Ramos
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Dave Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sullivan v. Fountain et al
as 1:2016cv00395
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniel Sullivan
Defendant:
Albert Fountain, Chris Baker, Ian Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Rapid Oil Change, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman
Defendant:
Rapid Oil Change, Inc. and Stanley Sullivan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
