Cases 71 - 80 of 432
West v. Mahindra Motors of North American, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00496
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Mahindra Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd, Jolly-Lewis Enterprises, Inc., Mahindra Motors of North American, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lane West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Robison Tire Company, Inc. v. Walls Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00121
Defendant:
Lewis Walls and Walls Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robison Tire Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00439
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC, John Doe Defendants 1 through 10 and Dollar General Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tonya S. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lewis et al v. Social Security
as 1:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Derek C. Lewis and IJ J. L.
Defendant:
Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Great Lakes Insurance SE v. One Stop Mart, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
Great Lakes Insurance SE
Defendant:
One Stop Mart, LLC , Mohamed Alabdy, Moe's Mini Mart LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00326
Plaintiff:
Reginald Butler and Jacobs Johnson
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Tyrone Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lewis v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2018cv00258
Plaintiff:
Jackie D. Lewis
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. Lewis et al
as 3:2018cv00244
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Harper
Defendant:
Tyrone Lewis, Mary Rushing and Unknown McLuarin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farm Credit Leasing Services Corporation v. Childress
as 1:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Farm Credit Leasing Services Corporation
Defendant:
Lewis Lee Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
