Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Cos O. Denham
Defendant:
United States Government and Internal Revenue Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Stangel v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
John A. Stangel
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bland v. Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bland
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Smith v. Vannoy et al
as 5:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Marcus Deshawn Smith
Defendant:
Darrell Vannoy, Monica Carter, William DeRevere and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Taylor
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Linda I. Aponte
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2020cv00734
Plaintiff:
Amberia Morton
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rubin Lublin, LLC v. Hull et al
as 3:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Alanda C. Hull, John S. Hull and The Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Rubin Lublin, LLC
Masters Plan v. D & D Real Estate, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00878
Defendant:
Charles D. Herrington, Dr. Calvin Ramsey, The Department of Treasury of the United States-Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff:
Masters Plan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
