Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Woodland v. Yazoo County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff: Deonte Woodland
Defendant: Yazoo County, Mississippi, Sheriff Jeremy McCoy and Chief Deputy Kenny Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gibbs et al v. AT&T Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff: Vinson Gibbs, Cleotha Gibbs, Jr., Jeremy Fields and others
Defendant: AT&T Corporation and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thompson v. Mississippi Power Company
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff: Jeremy A. Thompson
Defendant: Mississippi Power Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Green v. USA
as 1:2024cv00018
Petitioner: Jeremy Rhea Green
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thompson v. American Express Company
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: Jeremy Andrew Thompson
Defendant: American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thompson v. Trustmark National Bank
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff: Jeremy Andrew Thompson
Defendant: Trustmark National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thompson v. Synchrony Bank
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff: Jeremy Andrew Thompson
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
McCarty v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi et al
as 1:2023cv00333
Plaintiff: Jeremy Michael McCarty
Defendant: City of Biloxi, Mississippi, Aaron Smith, Andrew England and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?