Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Barlow et al v. Trulliant Federal Credit Union Bank et al
as 5:2020cv00153
Defendant:
Trulliant Federal Credit Union Bank and Marcia M. Farrow
Plaintiff:
Sarah David and Clinton C. Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. The State of North Carolina, 10th Judicial District, Criminal Courts et al
as 5:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Howard Green McCoy, Robert Early Howard, Jr., James Howard Hickland and others
Plaintiff:
Nadia Arlette Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hogan v. Buck et al
as 4:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Hogan
Defendant:
Asa B Buck, III, Daniel King, Carteret County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland, et al v. Jackson, et al
as 7:2012cv00207
Plaintiff:
Mike Strickland , Jo Allison Strickland and Sarah Strickland
Defendant:
Tina Jackson and City of Clinton, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sullivan v. Cannady et al
as 7:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Brett Donald Sullivan
Defendant:
Hugh A. Cannady , Michael Gilchrist , Robert Kilroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
