Cases 111 - 120 of 126
Morris v. Scenera Research LLC et al
as 5:2009cv00439
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Morris
Defendant:
Scenera Research LLC and Ryan C. Fry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Morris v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv00436
Plaintiff:
Odessa N. Morris
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Scenera Research LLC v. Morris
as 5:2009cv00412
Plaintiff:
Scenera Research LLC
Defendant:
Robert Paul Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Morris & Associates, Inc. v. Cooling & Applied Technology, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Morris & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Cooling & Applied Technology, Inc. and Cooling & Applied Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Bennett et al
as 5:2008ct03140
Plaintiff:
Jamal C. Lewis
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Dennis Rowland, Tarquintus Walser and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Rowland et al
as 5:2008ct03126
Defendant:
Dennis Rowland, Tarquintus Walser and Morris Reid
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morris v. Edmonds et al
as 5:2008cv00239
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
J.B. Edmonds, Rocky Mount Police Department and The City Of Rocky Mount, N.C.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kendall v. US Parole Commission et al
as 5:2008hc02005
Petitioner:
Morris Wilton Kendall
Respondent:
US Parole Commission and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stevenson v. Cherry et al
as 5:2007ct03146
Plaintiff:
Roger Stevenson
Defendant:
N. Cherry, C/O Speller, Sergeant James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARRINGTON et al v. Bryan et al
as 5:2007cv00386
Plaintiff:
RONALD ARRINGTON, Ruby Arrington, Curtis Barnes and others
Defendant:
Paula Priscilla Bryan, Deborah Gaines, Gladys Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
