Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Davis et al v. Shekita et al
as 5:2012cv00504
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr. and J.F.D.
Defendant:
Melanie A. Shekita, Michelle Savage, Danielle Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pickett v. Perrit et al
as 5:2012hc02125
Petitioner:
Lewis Pickett
Respondent:
Brad Perrit, Reuben Young and Beverly Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2011ct03258
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Beverly Perdue, Melanie A. Shekita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Bell et al
as 5:2011ct03226
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Leonard Dunbar
Defendant:
Ronald Bell, Jr., Beverly Perdue, Alvin W. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. NC Department of Correction et al
as 5:2011ct03182
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
NC Department of Correction, Alvin Keller, Robert C. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willingham v. Jackson et al
as 5:2011ct03162
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Willingham
Defendant:
HL Jackson, D. Davis, Officer Mace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muldrow v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2011ct03160
Plaintiff:
Donnell Muldrow
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, County of Johnston, Joseph B. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nixon v. Perdue et al
as 5:2011cv00404
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Nixon
Defendant:
Beverly Perdue , Elizabeth Ann Binette , Bobby J. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunbar v. Bell et al
as 5:2011ct03105
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Leonard Dunbar
Defendant:
Ronald Bell, Jr., Beverly Perdue, Robert C. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Branker et al
as 5:2011ct03071
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
G. J. Branker, North Carolina Department of Correction, North Carolina Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
