Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Tapler v. Robinson et al
as 5:2023ct03146
Plaintiff:
Michael Tapler
Defendant:
Sharod Robinson and Joseph Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockamy v. Robinson et al
as 5:2023ct03145
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lockamy
Defendant:
Sharod Robinson and Joseph Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bungardner-Lockamy et al v. Robinson et al
as 5:2023ct03132
Plaintiff:
Zachary Bumgardner-Lockamy, Antonio Lockamy and Michael Tapler
Defendant:
Sharod Robinson and Joseph Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson, III v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02077
Petitioner:
Jim Robinson, III
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Durham P.D. et al
as 5:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen
Defendant:
Durham P.D., D. Robinson, Elaine O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Sarah Robinson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Waters v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023ct03044
Plaintiff:
Dakota Waters
Defendant:
United States of America, Dr. J. Halbsgut, Ms. James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Entered in Error
as 7:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Sarah Robinson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
