Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 239
Lamons v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02254
Petitioner: Turhan Lamons
Respondent: Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Henkel v. Scientific Calibration, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00653
Plaintiff: Kelly Henkel
Defendant: Scientific Calibration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walker v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02232
Petitioner: Larry Walker
Respondent: Lynn Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03290
Plaintiff: David Anthony Harris
Defendant: Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Monica Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burghart v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02225
Petitioner: Bobby Burghart
Respondent: L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2023ct03279
Plaintiff: Randy Dewayne Pittman
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, L.B. Kelly and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02207
Petitioner: Daimean Thomas
Respondent: Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Drayer v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01268
Plaintiff: Kelly Drayer
Defendant: United States of America
Interested Party: Torts Branch USDOJ
Gale v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023ct03237
Plaintiff: Brian Gale
Defendant: Lyn B. Kelly and C. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Soto v. Town of Rolesville et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Defendant: Town of Rolesville Board of Commissioners, Town of Rolesville, Town Council and others
Plaintiff: Orlando Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?