Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Tyler v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2013ct03139
Plaintiff:
Casey Rafael Tyler
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter and Van McCullough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2013hc02126
Petitioner:
Joseph Casey McGhee
Respondent:
State of North Carolina, United States of America, United States Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGhee v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013ct03078
Plaintiff:
Joseph Casey McGhee
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Congress, United States Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterman et al v. Causey et al
as 5:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Dianna Peterman and B.P.
Defendant:
Pat Causey, Elizabeth Spillman, Melinda Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cook v. Lewis et al
as 5:2012ct03219
Plaintiff:
Michael O. Cook
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Robert Jones, Sgt. Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Cannady et al
as 7:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Brett Donald Sullivan
Defendant:
Hugh A. Cannady , Michael Gilchrist , Robert Kilroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee et al v. Obama et al
as 5:2012ct03068
Plaintiff:
Joseph Casey McGhee, Larry D. Boney, Carlos Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama and United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. North Carolina
as 5:2011mc00077
Plaintiff:
Joseph Casey McGhee
Defendant:
North Carolina
Credle v. Lewis et al
as 5:2011ct03120
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Credle
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, George Kenworthy, Brett Godwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. Casey
as 5:2011ct03109
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Defendant:
William C. Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
