Cases 41 - 50 of 210
Clark v. Simpson et al
as 5:2022ct03252
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Simpson, Dr. Straiger, Dr. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clarke v. Amgen Inc.
as 7:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Susan Clarke
Defendant:
Amgen Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Clark v. Universal Adcom, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Clark
Defendant:
Universal Adcom, LLC, James Gildenblatt, Conner Gildenblatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
Clark v. Universal Adcom, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Clark
Defendant:
Universal Adcom, LLC, James Gildenblatt, Conner Gildenblatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
James v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03110
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper, Todd Pomeroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark
as 5:2022hc02023
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Clark
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Whitehurst v. Clark et al
as 5:2022ct03047
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Demetrius A. Clark, Anthony A. Adams, Timothy Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Smith et al
as 5:2021ct03323
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clark
Defendant:
Jacqueline Smith, Anna Demeka Bell, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
