Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Solomon v. Raleigh Police Dept.
as 5:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
Patrick Solomon
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cynor v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2015ct03113
Plaintiff:
Leonard Cynor
Defendant:
Jo Lassiter, N.C. Dept. of Public Safety and Correctional Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Dept. of Corrections
as 5:2015hc02085
Petitioner:
William A. Patterson
Respondent:
Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Solomon v. Raleigh Police Dept.
as 5:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Patrick Solomon
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. N. C. State Dept. of Human and Health, et al
as 5:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Wendell M. Turner
Defendant:
N. C. State Dept. of Human and Health and State of North Carolina Gov.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard v. Vance County Sheriff Dept., et al
as 5:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Emma Victoria Johnson Howard
Defendant:
Vance County Sheriff Dept., W. B. Lilley, Vance County District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Clinton Police Dept. et al
as 7:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
Derick Demetrice Simmons
Defendant:
Clinton Police Dept., Unknown Police Officer and City of Clinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2014ct03220
Plaintiff:
Samuel Junior Jackson, Napoleon J. Rankin Bey, James K. Hoyle Bey and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and N.C. Dept. of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bess v. Hassam et al
as 5:2013ct03181
Plaintiff:
Telemanchus Monte Bess
Defendant:
Doctor Hassam, N.C. Dept. of Public Safety and Lanesboro Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorne v. Henderson et al
as 5:2013ct03180
Plaintiff:
Michael Thorne
Defendant:
Roshanna Henderson, Ronald Mayes and N.C. Dept. of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
