Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Brown v. NC Department of Correction et al
as 5:2009ct03117
Plaintiff:
Curtis V. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
NC Department of Correction and S. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Culpepper v. North Carolina Department of Correction et al
as 5:2009ct03070
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Culpepper
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Correction and Richard Broadwell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carrera v. Bennett et al
as 5:2008ct03036
Plaintiff:
Pedro Crisantos Carrera
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Wayne Talbert, Mrs. Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vann v. Beck et al
as 5:2008hc02031
Petitioner:
Webster Dayton Vann
Respondent:
Theodis Beck and North Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Capps v. North Carolina Department of Correction et al
as 5:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
Shannon Capps
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Correction, Theodis Beck and Boyd Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rippy v. North Carolina Department of Correction
as 5:2008ct03019
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Rippy, Jr.
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Beck et al
as 5:2008ct03017
Plaintiff:
Sebastian X. Moore
Defendant:
Theodis Beck and North Carolina Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tompkins v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2007ct03152
Plaintiff:
Stuart Wayne Tompkins
Defendant:
Department of Correction, T. R. Carroll, Chris Batten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
