Cases 1 - 10 of 417
Fitch et al v. Tyrrell County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joyce Sykes Fitch, Mark Mixon, Sherryreed Robinson and others
Defendant:
Tyrrell County Board of Commissioners, Nathan Everett, Nina Griswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McDonald v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Mark McDonald
Defendant:
United States of America
Moorhead v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Mark W Moorhead
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Icker v. Grimaldo et al
as 5:2024ct03086
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Icker
Defendant:
G. Grimaldo, C. Newsom, Mr. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ford v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. d/b/a ECU Health Inc., a/k/a Vidant Medical Center, Claudia E. Goettler, Michael R. Bard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boyd v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03014
Plaintiff:
Fred Lamar Boyd
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill, Captain McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassagne v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Mark Lassagne
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Revels v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Mark Anderson Revels
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
