Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Enstrom et al v. SAS Institute Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Betsy Enstrom, John Stana, Kevin Arias-Watkins and others
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc., The Board of Directors of SAS Institute, Inc., The Retirement Committee of SAS Institute Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Clemens v. FCI Butner - 2
as 5:2023ct03360
Plaintiff:
Charles Clemens
Defendant:
FCI Butner - 2, L.B. Kelly, Ms. Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watkins v. Hardy et al
as 5:2023ct03062
Plaintiff:
Van Brett Pierre Watkins, Sr. and Van Brett Watkins
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Hardy, Nurse Tanya Pitterford, Sergeant Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragland v. Vance County et al
as 5:2022ct03409
Plaintiff:
Kim Ragland and Kenneth Watkins
Defendant:
Vance County, City of Henderson, W.E. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Boxer et al
as 5:2021ct03211
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Captain Boxer, Lt. Mosley, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Moore
as 5:2021ct03192
Plaintiff:
Russell Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Sgt. D. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03178
Plaintiff:
Antain Jerrod Watkins
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
