Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Lancaster v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024ct03150
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Defendant:
Mashell L. Wilson, Timothy L. Lewis, Mr. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03129
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Hodge
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hodge v. Cook
as 5:2024ct03104
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Hodge
Defendant:
Dr. Patrick Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hodges v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Margaret Courtney Hodges
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Stueben v. Meade et al
as 5:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stueben
Defendant:
Desmond Meade, Contrina Vaughn, Steve Cowart and others
Counter Claimant:
Kimberly Hodge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hodge v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02075
Petitioner:
Robert L. Hodge
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spry v. Hodges
as 5:2024hc02010
Petitioner:
Nicholas James Spry
Respondent:
Bruce Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodges et al v. North Carolina CVS Pharmacy, LLC
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Paulette F Hodges and Mark Hodges
Defendant:
North Carolina CVS Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Staten v. Hodges
as 5:2023hc02214
Petitioner:
Tony Earl Staten
Respondent:
Superintendent Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitehurst v. Locklear et al
as 5:2023ct03236
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Victor Locklear, Bruce Hodges, Sean T. Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
