Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Drake v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02085
Petitioner:
Omarion Drake
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Dexter Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Drake v. Wake County Public Safety Center
as 5:2021ct03117
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lamarr Drake
Defendant:
Wake County Public Safety Center and Nishma Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennsylvania National Security Insurance Company v. Ortez et al
as 7:2019cv00059
Plaintiff:
Pennsylvania National Security Insurance Company
Defendant:
Luis J. Ortez, Kitchen and Lighting Designs Unlimited, Inc. and Theresa Beddard Estes as Administratrix of the Estate of Darren Drake Estes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drake v. Anderson
as 5:2018ct03048
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Drake, Sr.
Defendant:
Brandon Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ragland v. Harrison et al
as 5:2018ct03002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Terrance Ragland
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, Sgt. Scott, Lt. McDougal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake v. Warden FMC Butner
as 5:2015hc02004
Petitioner:
Phillip Lamont Drake
Respondent:
Warden FMC Butner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Yates v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP
as 5:2014mc00001
Plaintiff:
Richard Yates
Defendant:
Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Warren et al v. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers LLP et al
as 7:2010cv00071
Defendant:
Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers LLP and Adam M. Gottsegen
Plaintiff:
Robert Warren and Jacquelin Warren
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
