Cases 21 - 30 of 40
BLACKBURN et al v. TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE et al
as 1:2014cv00560
Defendant:
TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE , J. L. REDDEN and KERNERSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
TERESA BLACKBURN and ADRIAN MARTINEZ-PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
QUALITY BUILT HOMES INCORPRATED v. TOWN OF CARTHAGE
as 1:2013cv00792
Plaintiff:
QUALITY BUILT HOMES INCORPRATED
Defendant:
TOWN OF CARTHAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
HUNTER, et al v. TOWN OF MOCKSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, et al
as 1:2012cv00333
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. HUNTER , RICK A. DONATHAN and JERRY D. MEDLIN
Defendant:
TOWN OF MOCKSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT W. COOK and CHRISTINE W. BRALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRANFORD, et al v. TOWN OF BADIN, NORTH CAROLINA, et al
as 1:2011cv00645
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CRANFORD and KEN MCRAE
Defendant:
TOWN OF BADIN, NORTH CAROLINA , BRYAN LAMBERT and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ELABANJO v. BELLEVANCE
as 1:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA JONES ELABANJO
Defendant:
JASON BELLEVANCE , OFFICER BRANDON PERRY , OFFICER TELFAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLUTTZ v. HOUPE, et al
as 1:2011cv00199
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR KLUTTZ
Defendant:
PRESTON GENE HOUPE and THE TOWN OF SPENCER
Mediator:
WAYNE P. HUCKEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CAUDLE et al v. TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE et al
as 1:2010cv00937
Plaintiff:
DARLA CAUDLE and MICHAEL GOAD
Defendant:
TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE , KENNETH GAMBLE , JOHN FLOYD STOKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
